Home

About us

News

Search

Sitemap

Help

Demo


Mortgage

Movers

Moving

Topics

Bilingual Education Bilingual Education

Child Child

Child-Book Child Book

Child Care Child Care

Child Clothing Child Clothing

Child Development Child Development

Child Gift Child Gift

Child Health Child Health

Child Psychology Child Psychology

Distance Education Distance Education

e Learning e Learning

Early Childhood Education Early Childhood Education

Education Education

Education Online Education Online

Fun Quiz Fun Quiz

Kid Kid

Kid Game Kid Game

Kid News Kid News

Kindergarten Kindergarten

No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind

Preschool Preschool

Preschool Education Preschool Education

Puzzle Puzzle

Supporters

 

Early Childhood Education Spending

Last Updated Aug 20, 2008 03:14 AM

 

WASHINGTON, D.C. - Responding to President Bush’s call for action to improve early childhood education, Republican members of the U.S. House Committee on Education & the Workforce today unveiled legislation that would strengthen the academic components of the federal Head Start program for disadvantaged children and encourage states to maintain or increase funding for early childhood education. The bill - the School Readiness Act of 2003 (H.R. 2210), authored by Rep. Mike Castle (R-DE) - focuses on reducing the “readiness gap” that exists between Head Start graduates and their more affluent peers when they reach kindergarten.

The School Readiness Act would allow states to receive the ability to coordinate Head Start programs with their own early education initiatives in exchange for an agreement not to reduce funding for early childhood education. The bill also includes new provisions to improve Head Start teacher quality, and would keep the program at the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS). It would reauthorize the Head Start program through Fiscal Year 2008.

“The simple truth is that children in Head Start are learning, but they aren’t learning as much as they deserve to be learning,” said Castle, chairman of the Education Reform Subcommittee. “Head Start children deserve the chance to enter kindergarten at the same level as other children their age do, but that isn’t happening. The current system is giving these children a head start, but it isn’t giving them the best start possible.”

Studies show that while children in Head Start show improvement, they still leave the program with skills and knowledge levels far below national averages for U.S. children. As a result of this “readiness gap,” Head Start children are not being adequately prepared for school in key areas of cognitive development that have been shown to be critical for later school success.

“Head Start is a great program that is capable of achieving even greater results,” said Education and the Workforce Committee Chairman John Boehner (R-OH), an original cosponsor of the bill. “We should not be content with giving these children anything less than the best this nation can offer. If we simply settle for the status quo in Head Start, we’ll be leaving the job unfinished for hundreds of thousands of disadvantaged children.”

“If states are willing to make a commitment to funding early childhood education and maintaining high standards, then the federal government should be willing to give them the ability to coordinate Head Start with their own early childhood education programs,” said Boehner.

To close the readiness gap and strengthen Head Start, the School Readiness Act would:

Emphasize “what works” in preparing disadvantaged children for school. The proposal would strengthen Head Start’s academic standards by emphasizing cognitive development and the results of scientifically-based research in topics critical to children’s school readiness (including language, pre-reading, pre-mathematics, and English language acquisition). The changes would be similar to those adopted with strong bipartisan support for President Bush’s Reading First and Early Reading First initiatives, established in the No Child Left Behind Act for K-12 education.



Require no new testing. The proposal would maintain current law with respect to regular local assessments of the academic progress being made by children enrolled in Head Start. No new testing would be mandated under the bill. Local Head Start grantees would be subject to the same three-year review (“triennial review”) process as they are under current law, but would be evaluated based on criteria that are more straightforward and reflective of the progress being made in preparing children for school.

Ensure that local Head Start centers are fairly evaluated on their performance. The bill would eliminate “performance measures” in current law that are arbitrary and do not adequately gauge children’s progress. These flawed measures would be replaced by a more straightforward system that takes into account a child’s progress in key areas relating to school readiness, better enabling parents and teachers to know how each child is progressing.


Continue to provide extra help for Head Start centers identified as underachieving. Under the bill (as under current law), Head Start centers identified as underachieving would qualify for additional assistance. Chronic underachievers that continue to underachieve even after receiving additional assistance would be subject to review, as under current law.

Improve teacher quality in Head Start. The bill would ensure that a greater number of Head Start teachers are adequately trained and educated in early childhood development, particularly in teaching the fundamental skills of language, pre-reading, and pre-mathematics. It would require all new Head Start teachers to have at least an associates degree in early childhood education or a related field within three years, and 50 percent of Head Start teachers nationwide to have at least a bachelors degree by 2008. These provisions will help to meet a goal set recently by the National Head Start Association, which called for 75 percent of all Head Start teachers to have at least an associates degree by 2005, and for all Head Start teachers to have at least an associates degree by 2008.


Serve more children by reducing HHS expenses. The bill would place a 2 percent cap on U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) spending for Head Start expenses, allowing as many as 10,000 more disadvantaged children to be served by Head Start. The legislation specifies that at least 50 percent of such funds would have to be used at the local level, rather than by federal or state officials.

Preserve all current health and nutrition services for Head Start children. While the academic components of Head Start would be strengthened, all existing health and nutrition-related components of Head Start would be preserved and extended.

Keep Head Start at the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS). HHS would continue to administer the Head Start program under the bill.

Provide incentives for states to maintain or expand funding for early childhood education. As many states confront budget difficulties, some are reducing (or considering reducing) their spending on early childhood education programs. To provide an incentive for states to continue investing in early childhood education, the School Readiness Act would create a limited demonstration project by which a limited number of states could voluntarily apply for and receive the option of coordinating Head Start programs with their own early childhood education programs, in exchange for an agreement to maintain or expand funding for early childhood education. The “state demo” would be limited to states with a demonstrated investment in early childhood education and an established, pre-existing preschool system. Participating states would be barred from making funding cuts to early childhood education programs as a condition of their participation. In addition, a “hold harmless” provision is included guaranteeing funding for Head Start centers in participating states during the first year of implementation of the demonstration project.

Shield Head Start and other early childhood education programs against state budget cuts. The bill would effectively “wall off” early childhood education funding in states that choose to participate in the state demonstration program. Under the bill, a state participating in the demonstration project would be required to maintain or expand its financial commitment to early childhood education to qualify for participation. Participating states would not be permitted to use early childhood funds for anything other than Head Start and early childhood education.

Increase Head Start funding. The bill would authorize a $203 million increase in funding for Head Start - to $6.87 billion, meaning Head Start funding will have nearly doubled in the past seven years. Funding for Head Start in FY 1996, the first fiscal year under a Republican-led House, was approximately $3.8 billion. The bill would also authorize a separate $5 million to provide additional administrative support to states who are selected to participate in the state demonstration program. This money would be a one-time allotment to help such states coordinate Head Start with their state initiatives.

The state demonstration project in the School Readiness Act reflects the Head Start principles adopted recently by the bipartisan National Governors Association (NGA).

“Governors believe there is an increased need for greater collaboration among all programs that provide services to children, including Head Start, in an effort to improve child well-being and help to move more individuals and families toward self-sufficiency,” declared the nation’s governors policy statement adopted at the NGA’s 2002 Annual Meeting. “Governors applaud the President for offering a proposal to improve and build upon the success of Head Start through an increased emphasis on early learning and a greater role for Governors in the oversight of the program.”

 

See also Early Childhood Education 448 1 - 10

Early Childhood Education Articulation Plan

The connecticut early childhood education articulation plan A Recommended Process for Articulation of Associate Level Early Childhood education Education Programs and Baccalaureate Level Programs leading to State Teacher Certification in Early Childhood Education The Connecticut Early Childhood Education Articulation Plan was developed in response to the growing recognition that early educational experiences are crucial to the later su...

Early Childhood Education Guide

When researching a new topic it is often necessary to get an overview, explanations of unfamiliar terms, or brief factual information. Some of the sources listed below provide general coverage, while others are more subject specific. To find additional information sources, check Quest, the library catalogue. Coleman, J. G. (1993). The Early Intervention Dictionary: A Multidisciplinary Guide to Terminology. Rockville, MD: Woodbine House. A multidisciplinary guide to the terminology involved in early childhood education and the education of childre...

Early Childhood Education Development Strategy

Early Childhood Education: An Economic Development Strategy Why are economists, bankers, public officials and business leaders across the country talking about young children and their early education? Because they know that the key to business success and economic prosperity is investing wisely in human capital. The idea of early childhood education as an economic development strategy is gaining significant momentum across the country. States such as Louisiana and Pennsylvania have included early childhood education as key strategies in their economic development pla...

Consultant Early Childhood Education Exam

MICHAEL R. BLOOMBERG Mayor MARTHA K. HIRST Commissioner THE CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF CITYWIDE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES APPLICATIONS CENTER 18 WASHINGTON STREET NEW YORK, NY 10004 N O T I C E O F E X A M I N A T I O N REQUIRED FORMS APPLICATION FORM READ CAREFULLY AND SAVE FOR FUTURE REFERENCE CONSULTANT ( ...

Early Childhood Education Statistics

Introduction Early childhood education is recognised as important because learning development during the early formative years has a link to educational outcomes later on in life. There is ongoing interest and work on early childhood education both at state and national level. State and territory early childhood initiatives include Families first (NSW), Best Start (Victoria) and Our Kids (Tasmania). The Australian Government, in consultation with stakeholders, including state and territory governments, is developing a National Agenda for Early Childhood to guide planning for the future of Australia's children. Such initiatives recognise the importance of the family fo...

Early Childhood Education Programs

Compares the effects of three preschool curricula--the High/Scope model, the Distar model, and a traditional nursery school model--on various factors in the lives of previous participants at the age of 15. Programs were roughly equal in producing IQ and achievement gains. Social and behavioral outcomes greatly favored High/Scope and traditional nursery school over Distar. Smothergill, N.L.; Olson, F.; and ...

Congruence Between The Early Childhood Education

The results indicate that high quality programs with careful design and supervision, using a variety of strategies, can be effective, and that these various strategies can be effective for different types of lowincome children. This gives program planners the flexibility to be responsive to local needs and parental inputs in designing programs which build on strengths and abilities of the families they serve. (p. 65) Half-Day Versus Full-Day Kindergarten. What about the half-day/full-day kindergarten issue? Full-day k...

 

More Articles

Early Childhood Education Programs

Effectiveness of Early Childhood Education

Congruence Between The Early Childhood Education

Early Childhood Education Handicapped Children

The Early Childhood Education Research

Assesment Of Early Childhood Education

Early Childhood Education Statistics

Consultant Early Childhood Education Exam

Early Childhood Education Spending

OECD Thematic Review of Early Childhood Education

The Early Childhood Education Unit

Early Childhood Education Guide

Early Childhood Education Accreditation FAQ

Early Childhood Education Development Strategy

Early Childhood Education A Call to Action

Research on Early Childhood Education

Early Childhood Education Articulation Plan

High-Quality Early Childhood Education

Early childhood education fees monitoring

The Success of Early Childhood Education Programs

Early Childhood Education Strategic Planning

 

Home - About us - Search - Site map - Help - Demo

Bilingual Education - Child - Child Book - Child Care - Child Clothing - Child Development - Child Gift
Child Health - Child Psychology - e-Learning - Early Childhood Education - Education - Education Online - Fun Quiz
Kid - Kid Game - Kid News - Kindergarten - No Child Left Behind - Preschool - Puzzle

© copyright 2005 to Kids Learn Online .com

www.KidsLearnOnline.com